Sh.V.R. addressed to Sovyetskiy district court of Voronezh with a statement of claim concerning a recognition of property title of 1/3 of a flat as succession. Sh.V.R. and B.V.I. contracted a marriage. B.V.I. passed away in 2010. B.V.I. had no will left. Sh.V.R. did not enter succession by applying to a notary to enter succession and receive a certificate of proprietorship. A specialist from Economic and Law Center «Paritet» proved that Sh.V.R. commited acts proving a factual succession, such as living in the flat, paying the bills, and committing al actions necessary for maintaining inheritable property. Taking the above mentioned into account, Sovyetskiy district court of Voronezh took a decision to satisfy plaintiff’s claims.
LLC «DBI» addressed to the Arbitration court of Tambov region with a suit against LLC «А» concerning indebtedness as per contractor’s agreement on building and assembly jobs. A specialist from Economic and Law Center «Paritet» acted in behalf of the plaintiff. Our specialist collected and presented evidence of completing building and assembly jobs in full volume, in due course and in the order established by law and contract. Having evaluated the above-mentioned proofs and evaluated the defendant’s reasons, the Arbitration court of Tambov region satisfied the demands of LLC «DBI» in full volume.
A criminal case in relation to a crime provided for in p.«а» p. 2 art. 199 of Criminal Code was commenced against P.D.V. A barrister from Economic and Law Center «Paritet» guarded interests of P.D.V. As a result of barrister’s actions and by the results of forensic accounting expert examination which was performed with the participation of our specialists, it was proved that the actions of P.D.V. contained no fault. The investigator of special department of Department of Internal Affairs of Voronezh region took a decision to dismiss a criminal case against P.D.V. due to a lack of corpus delicti in his actions.