Arbitral tribunal of the Voronezh region considered the case on the claim of SI «SES» (Sanitary & Epidemiological Station) to the company «K» for damages in the sum of 114,931 rubles. 70 kop. under the contract of lease. Representatives from the Economic and Law Center «Paritet» were on the side of the defendant. After getting acquainted with the case materials, as well as the documents submitted to him by the principal it was established, that while calculating debts on rental SI «SES» was basing on inappropriate tariffs. In addition, the decision of the Arbitration Court of Voronezh region previously entered into force has established the lack of debt between LLG «K» to SI «SES» on another lease, which in turn proves the absence of debt by contract, similar to that complained of. Considering the case the court took these circumstances into account, and the claims of SI «SES» were denied.
CH.V.A. presented a petition against FSEI HVE of reprimand imposed on him as illegal and recovery of compensation for moral damage. The specialist from Economic and Law Center «Paritet» proved that the disciplinary action in the form of a reprimand was imposed for reasons conflicting with the current labor law, in connection with violation of procedures for imposing disciplinary action, as corresponding adequate evidence were provided to the court. Central District Court of Voronezh took the evidence into account and gave them a proper assessment, the claims CH.V.A. to find the reprimand illegal and recover moral damages were satisfied in full.
The Economic and Law Center «Paritet» was addressed to by V.P.YU. suspected of committing a crime under Art. 30 and Part 3. 159 of the Code (fraud) for the protection of her interests. Attorney from the Center filed the complaints in the defense of the suspect to the Public Prosecutor of the Voronezh region, indicating absence of any elements of the crime in the act committed by V.P.YU. as well as unfounded accusation. In particular the appeal contained proofs that V.P.YU. took all necessary measures to pay off insurance compensation. The prosecutor of Voronezh region having considered all above indicated circumstances found no evidence of indicia of a crime in V.P.YU.’s actions. The criminal case was dismissed.